Code + markup
Semantic HTML, landmark regions, heading hierarchy, form labels, ARIA attributes where they actually belong. We remove ARIA that was fighting the browser — a surprisingly common problem.
Audit identified 180 violations? We'll close every one against WCAG 2.1 AA — code, design, ARIA, PDFs, the whole picture — without touching the parts that make the site look like yours. Small sites wrap in 10–14 business days. 30-day warranty.
Every layer gets rebuilt to WCAG 2.1 AA. No shortcuts, no overlays, no 'good enough'.
Semantic HTML, landmark regions, heading hierarchy, form labels, ARIA attributes where they actually belong. We remove ARIA that was fighting the browser — a surprisingly common problem.
We tune colors to pass 4.5:1 without killing your brand. Sometimes it's a shade darker on a CTA, sometimes it's a new focus state. The visual language stays yours.
Every interactive element gets reachable, traversable, and visibly focused. Skip links, focus traps in modals done right, and an escape hatch from every menu.
We run VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS, fix what's broken, then read the site aloud one more time. If it doesn't make sense to a human listener, it doesn't ship.
Tagged PDFs, reading order, alt text on figures, table headers. The boring, forgotten stuff that plaintiff firms love to flag because almost nobody does it right.
Every fix date-stamped, every success criterion mapped in a Voluntary Product Accessibility Template. Your legal team can hand this directly to a court or a procurement officer.
We clone your site to a staging environment. Nothing touches production until you sign off on the fixes.
The violations most likely to trigger a demand letter: contrast, keyboard traps, missing form labels, broken focus order. Shipped first.
Everything else in the audit: alt text, ARIA cleanup, landmarks, PDF tagging, focus states, skip links. Each fix lands with documentation.
We re-run the audit, verify zero-regression, ship to production, and hand you the VPAT. Then we re-scan 7 days later to catch anything that drifted.
No upsells on the warranty. No hourly billing if we find something extra. No surprises after you've signed.
Tell us about your site and we'll scope the project — timeline, team access requirements, and what the fix window looks like for your stack.
No — and we're almost obsessive about this. Good accessibility rebuilds structure underneath, not surface above. Typography stays, colors stay (sometimes with a small contrast nudge on CTAs), layout stays. Our goal is for the only people who notice the change to be the ones using a keyboard or screen reader.
Yes. Studio AM is a development studio — WordPress (Divi, Elementor, custom themes), Shopify (Dawn and custom Liquid), Webflow, Next.js, Astro, and most modern front-end stacks are our day job. If it renders HTML and you can give us access, we can fix it.
If a bug or regression in our fixes triggers a new WCAG violation within 30 days of launch, we fix it free. What's NOT covered: new features you build after launch (that's what the quarterly review retainer is for) or fixes to third-party scripts we didn't touch.
Yes — we call it an 'assisted remediation' model where we write the fix specs and your team ships them. It works best when your dev team has bandwidth and a bit of WCAG experience — otherwise the hand-off adds more friction than it saves.
Accessibility drifts. Every new page, theme update, or developer 'tiny fix' can introduce a violation. We offer a quarterly review retainer specifically for this — a manual re-audit every 90 days and a short fix window afterwards to keep the site from degrading.